|
UFA Update
January 3, 2003
Joint Legislative Salmon Task Force. Revised Recommendations.
*The last two paragraphs of the report were inadvertently left off in the
original version.
TV Alert (Jan 3 & 7). The UA
Marine Advisory program has taped a show on marine protected areas. The
panelists on the show are: Rick Steiner (moderator, UA), Joe Uravitch (NOAA
National MPA Center, DC), Doug Woodby (ADFG MPA Task Force), Bob Thorstenson
(UFA Pres), Stephanie Madsen (Pacific Seafood Producers Assn and Resource
Development Council), Whit Sheard (the Ocean Conservancy, Anchorage), and
Paula Terrell (Alaska Marine Conservation Council). The show will be aired:
Jan 3, 7:00PM KAKM (Anchorage, MatSu, Kenai Pen) Jan 3, 9:00PM ARCS (Rural
Alaska) Jan 7, 8:00PM Alaska One (Juneau, Fairbanks, Bethel,
rural).
Table of Contents
-
Shutdown of fish plant will hit hard
-
Cartoon: Farmed Fish
-
Round Gold has surplus fishes and caviar dreams
-
State trade chief Greg Wolf goes to World Trade Center
-
Fish Factor: Grant allows Valdez to train fishermen to process,
sell their catch
-
Police can't find a body to go with slaying
-
Men Can Reduce Stroke Risk by Eating Fish
-
Radar monitoring Sound icebergs
-
Feds: State owns submerged land
-
NMFS: Interim TACs 2003
-
NMFS: Final Regs AFA Amendments
-
NMFS: Final rule to implement Steller sea lion protection
measures
-
Opinion: ADFG Commissioner
-
Chinese economy could boost exports
-
Fish Board's meeting now set for Jan. 31
-
Troubled waters: Salmon farming's foul fallout
-
Scientists tracked unusual voyage of abandoned vessel
-
BOF: Kenai River And Kasilof River Early-Run King Salmon
Conservation Plan (Written comment by Feb 7 03)
-
Alaskan fishermen turn to 'designer' salmon
-
Subsistence: Customary Trade Documents January 2003 Meeting
-
Subsistence: 2004 Call for Fishery Proposals (By 28 Mar 03)
-
Subsistence: Regional Advisory Council Applications/Nominations
(Due by February 28, 2003)
-
State fines Trident $1 million
-
Mystery man's hoax costs thousands
-
UFA- The ONLY State-wide Political Organization for Alaskan
Commercial Fishermen, by Bob Thorstenson, Jr.
-
Smart Marketers Know What Women Want (Seafood Business, Nov 02)
1.
Shutdown of fish plant will hit hard.
2. Cartoon: Farmed Fish.
3.
Round Gold has surplus fishes and caviar dreams.
4.
State trade chief Greg Wolf goes to World Trade Center
5.
Fish Factor: Grant allows Valdez to train fishermen to process,
sell their catch.
6. Police can't find a body to go with slaying.
7. Men Can Reduce Stroke Risk by Eating Fish.
8. Radar monitoring Sound icebergs
9. Feds: State owns submerged land.
10. NMFS: Interim TACs 2003
GOA
BSA
11.
NMFS: Final Regs AFA Amendments.
12. NMFS: Final rule to implement Steller sea lion protection
measures.
13.
Opinion: ADFG Commissioner.
14.
Chinese economy could boost exports.
15. Fish
Board's meeting now set for Jan. 31.
16.
Troubled waters: Salmon farming's foul fallout.
17.
Scientists tracked unusual voyage of abandoned vessel.
18.
BOF: Kenai River And Kasilof River Early-Run King Salmon
Conservation Plan.
19.
Alaskan fishermen turn to 'designer' salmon.
20. Subsistence: Customary Trade Documents 14 January 2003 Meeting.
Meeting Materials.
Appendix.
21.
Subsistence:
2004 Call for Fishery Proposals.
22. Subsistence: Regional Advisory Council
Applications/Nominations.
23. State fines Trident $1 million.
24. Mystery man's hoax costs thousands.
25. UFA- The ONLY State-wide Political Organization for Alaskan
Commercial Fishermen
Folks. You don’t need me to tell you that the Alaskan fishing industry
is a tale of two cities right now. Generally speaking, if you’re
operating with enough IFQs or you operate out west with whitefish,
you’re probably in pretty good shape. If you operate in salmon in any
fashion whatsoever, you’re probably not. Crab, shrimp, shellfish,
herring, it just depends.
So. We have two categories of members at UFA. For all our members we
need to have the proper political and regulatory connections and be
positioned to help deliver the benefit of these connections for the
fishing industry. Slightly under half our group members are non-salmon
folks for whom we need to work on the regulatory, environmental,
management scenarios and policies to ensure access to the resource.
Slightly over half our group members are salmon-only or salmon-plus
folks for whom we need to do the same as the non-salmon folks, but we
need to pull some economic revival for them as well.
Believe it or not, there is actual debate on this concept of economic
revival for the salmon fisheries. There are quite a few folks in Alaska
who are either diversified enough or are comfortable and willing to just
“wait and see”. They’re the smarter, highliner set and they’ve wisely
set things up for the long haul. I’m not diversified and I’m not very
comfortable, but I guess in another time and era I might just be with
these folks.
But I’m not. Along with most of the UFA board, I believe we need to
seriously work on economic packages to help our fishermen in Alaska. We
need a new deal. We need serious marketing dollars for salmon. We need
to change some of the ways we used to do business. Both fishermen and
processors. How much do we change? This is dependent upon what
region we’re from and how much we want to change. I seriously doubt
that the largest employer in any region in the state isn’t going to have
the say in how they change or don’t change their business environment.
I know one thing. I’m not about to tell someone from Chignik how to run
their business, just like I don’t want them to tell me how to run my
business. In some areas, like marketing, we’re going to be looking at
statewide packages. In others, like restructuring, it’s going to be up
to the individual regions and gear types.
Now, let me tell you a bit about UFA.
United Fishermen of Alaska (UFA) was founded in 1974. UFA is a trade
association that has no mandate or charter to negotiate or discuss fish
prices. I believe the organization that has that authority is USA- the
United Salmon Association - which is, by the way, a UFA member. We are
fortunate to have two USA members to work with, Scott McAllister and
Bruce Schactler, who head up our marketing committee. These gentlemen
volunteer their time to strategize on how best to deal with securing
marketing funds, demand tariffs on Chilean farmed salmon, and secure
funding for better transportation and infrastructure for our industry,
amongst other things. For example, in August, 2002, Senator Stevens
pledged $20 million to help Alaska with marketing efforts. There was
only one voice in Alaska asking for such funds. Not the Knowles
administration. Not ASMI. No, it was our two marketing co-chairs.
I’ll briefly list a few more of the dozens or hundreds of issues that
we’ve dealt with over the past couple of years. One of the other issues
that our Marketing co-Chairs took up was the price reporting issue with
Alaska processors. This was a very contentious issue between fishermen
and processors and it culminated in some very current and accurate price
reporting information.
In 2000, after the Feds took over managing federal waters in Alaska, we
were confronted with many challenges with the subsistence issue so our
Subsistence Chairman, David Bedford, went to DC and procured annual
funding of $250,000 for an education program to get Alaskan fishermen up
to speed on getting involved with this complicated issue.
In both 2000 and 2001, we took up lengthy and costly fights to oust
Board of Fisheries members whom we considered to have interests adverse
to Alaska’s commercial fishermen. Jerry McCune led this charge. Even
though we lost, we were able to convince the Governor to put two
commercial fishermen on the Board of Fish in 2002 for the first time in
his 8 year tenure.
In Fall 2001, we put together an internal UFA summit to determine what
the best course of action was for the overall industry. Certainly the
main issue was salmon and we came out of that three day session in
Petersburg with some legislation and a commitment to work further on
turning this industry around. The recent Legislative Task Force has
taken the ball from there. Two of the seven members of the task force
come from our board, Duncan Fields and Sue Aspelund.
In 2002 we put our back into then-Senator Frank Murkowski’s campaign for
Governor. I am pleased to remind you that he won that race handily and
that this is the first time that UFA has been heavily and actively
involved in helping to elect a Governor in our state. We endorsed
Governor Murkowski’s campaign in May of last year.
Also in 2002, we became involved, just as many of our groups had with
Stellers the year before, with another lawsuit involving the Marine
Mammal Protection Act. Three environmental groups have sued NMFS to
shut down or curtail fisheries ranging from Bristol Bay and Copper River
to Southeast. We’re still in the middle of this as of this writing.
There are many, many, many other issues that we’ve successfully and
unsuccessfully dealt with over the past couple years. These were just a
few examples.
Now, I’ll give you a quick rundown on where to find information about
UFA and how UFA is structured. There are many places where you can find
information about UFA. On the Alaska Report (www.alaskareport.com ),
run by Johnny Rice of Ketchikan, you can look up a search program for
UFA updates. Just type in any subject or name, including our board
members to see if they’re pulling their weight. Our website is
www.ufa-fish.org Our Executive Director is Tom Gemmell. His email
address is
ufa1@ufa-fish.org I’m the President, Bob Thorstenson, Jr.
You can reach me by directing email or calls through the office. Office
phone# is 907-586-2820 or Wireless Matrix satellite 6449.
Our Vice-President is Sue Aspelund and she actually was pretty much the
acting President from June through November of 2002 as I was busy
fishing in Southeast and Puget Sound. Get in touch with her through the
office as well. They’re pretty quick in their turnaround calls.
At the office you’ll find Mark Vinsel, our office manager, working year
round with Mr. Gemmell.
During the legislative session from January through May, you’ll find
“Mr. UFA”, Jerry McCune working as our lobbyist. Jerry develops
legislative strategy as well as carrying out board policy and helping
bills through the House and Senate committees and to the floor.
UFA has 34 board members. Three are elected by the UFA general
membership. Currently those three are myself, Bruce Schactler (Kodiak)
and Jeff Steele (Kodiak). The next vote for at-large members is this
next summer so if you want to get involved this is your chance. Make
sure your membership is current and just file your name with Tom G. at
(907) 586-2820. It’s disturbing when I hear dissent on how this
organization ought to be run and then the dissenters never seem to have
the time to actually challenge the board seats of those who are
purportedly on the wrong track.
The other 31 board members are representatives of the 31 member groups
of UFA. I won’t list them all here but alphabetically I believe the
first one is the Alaska Crab Coalition (operating in the Bering Sea) and
the last one is the Western Gulf of Alaska Fishermen’s Association
(representing small trawlers who operate from the Sand Point area). In
between you would find trollers, gillnetters, setnetters, longliners,
crabbers, seiners, hatchery associations, etc, etc
UFA is a Committee-run structure. The Chairmen of each committee bring
issues to the organization and then a consensus or a majority-rule is
developed on each issue or policy.
Our chairs and their committees are as follows:
Administration: Duncan Fields (Kodiak) and Rob Zuanich (Anchorage)
Statewide: Sue Aspelund (Also VP, from Cordova) and Jerry
McCune(Cordova)
Marketing: Bruce Schactler (Kodiak) and Scott McAllister
(Juneau)
Subsistence: David Bedford (Juneau)
FarmFish: Dale Kelley (Juneau)
Membership: Gig Decker (Wrangell)
National: Joe Childers (former Alaskan-currently Seattle)
In closing I’ve got just a few reminders. The times are challenging for
many of us. We’re in this together. This is your organization and your
biggest and best chance to affect big change to help us get back to a
point where we can once again make a family wage living. And if you’re
one of the smart ones who’s diversified or whatever, thanks for pitching
in as well. We never know when a regulation or environmental lawsuit is
going to change your fortunes and we always want to be on guard for that
as well. Kind of like preventative maintenance for you folks.
If you have any issue that you believe that UFA should be handling or a
direction that you’d like to see UFA run in, just let us know. Aside
from Tom, Mark and Jerry we are all volunteers and we could use input
and help from all over the state, and even from those of you who are
carpetbaggers like myself. I’ll repeat the email address and phone # in
case you missed it at the top.
ufa1@ufa-fish.org is the email and the
# is (907) 586-2820.
Sincerely,
Bob Thorstenson, Jr.
President, United Fishermen of Alaska
26. Smart marketers know what women want
November 2002 Trendwatch
Seafood industry looks to innovative marketing and product development
to tap female buying clout
By Bernie Monegain
Seafood merchandisers may have known for years that it’s women who
decide where, when and how to buy, prepare and eat seafood. But it’s
taken them a long time to step up to the plate and develop products and
marketing campaigns aimed specifically at women.
Women comprise 69 percent of supermarket shoppers, according to
Progressive Grocer magazine’s 2001 annual report, and that number has
budged little over the years. Women want quick, easy-to-prepare, tasty,
healthful and kid-friendly meals.
To deliver, seafood marketers are looking to new product development and
better marketing of existing products.
Women are usually more health-conscious, family-conscious and pressed
for time, says Linda Driscoll of the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute.
Often, they are managing both career and family, doing volunteer work
and keeping in touch with a circle of friends and business
acquaintances.
Driscoll, who oversees marketing campaigns for ASMI, believes the group
was right on target with its “Get In the Pink” salmon ads that appeared
in Woman’s Day, Cooking Light and Catholic Digest during Lent. The ads
emphasized the value of omega-3 fish oils and reminded women that a can
of salmon is as versatile as a can of tuna. The campaign included new
booklets of recipes for breakfast, lunch and dinner, with a section
devoted to kid-friendly recipes.
Driscoll examined the ingredients in recipes carefully, making sure the
list was short, the ingredients were readily available and the recipes
made sense. There’s no point to offering a recipe that calls for a third
of a can of evaporated milk, she says. “What do you do with the other
two-thirds?”
Driscoll says Nielsen Scantrack reports showed double-digit increases in
canned salmon sales in regions where the ads appeared. She notes that
this is not necessarily an accurate gauge of the campaign’s
effectiveness, since the data also reflect sales activity from any brand
promotions occurring at the same time.
ASMI’s salmon campaign might have been the exception to the rule, says
Linda Candler, VP of communications for the National Fisheries Institute
in Washington, D.C. Too often, seafood marketers “miss the boat by not
respecting our intelligence and our time,” she says.
“When these products are marketed to women, it’s still a 1950s kind of
approach,” one that assumes unlimited time and an interest in preparing
complicated entrées from a long list of ingredients.
Europeans have the right idea, Candler says. European markets carry a
vast array of seafood products that are ready to eat or ready to heat
and eat, from escargots to salmon pinwheels to a range of fresh fish —
marinated and/or sauced and ready for the oven or microwave.
Pat Shanahan, a seafood industry consultant in Seattle, agrees that most
seafood marketing campaigns fall short, particularly in their health
message.
“We still have to get it into the vernacular,” Shanahan says, “that
[seafood] is a really healthy choice for all members of the family, not
just women or guys with heart problems.”
Most women typically rotate the family menu among seven to 10 recipes,
she says, noting, “We need to get fish to be one or two of their meals.”
To do that, Shanahan says, the industry has to help dispel the notion
that children don’t like fish. “Fish is kid food,” Shanahan says. “So
much of it is simple and mild.”
Several seafood companies are developing products to meet women’s needs,
but that’s a tough job in an industry geared to moving poundage.
Ocean Pro Industries in Washing-ton, D.C., developed a line of 10
ready-to-heat Fish N’ Easy seafood entrées, including Maryland Style
Crab Cakes, Teriyaki Tuna and Stuffed Salmon with Monterey Spice,
packaged with a side of rice or potatoes. The Giant and Safeway grocery
chains carry the entrées, which are selling modestly, says Greg Casten,
Ocean Pro’s president. They fly out of the store when they are on
special for $3.49 but seem too expensive at $6.99 to $9.99 apiece, he
says.
Casten says he has not been able to get supermarkets to lower their
margins, and he is also discouraged by hefty slotting fees. “It’s such a
good-old-boy network in the seafood world,” he says. Casten spent $1
million for the limited launch of Fish N’ Easy. He’s losing a little
money on the effort. To go nationwide with his brand, he’d have to spend
another $1 million or $2 million, he says. He’s not sure if he will.
Morey’s Seafood International has always targeted women in both
marketing and product development, says Sara Danforth, Morey’s marketing
manager. Morey’s Classic line of marinated salmon entrées can be baked
or microwaved and include a pop-up timer to prevent overcooking. The
entrées have proven popular, but Danforth declined to discuss specific
numbers.
Cuisine Solutions, which prepares seafood for the foodservice industry,
has targeted women in recent months by placing heat-and-serve entrées in
Safeways and Krogers in test markets. The fish is cooked under water to
preserve the protein and is then vacuum packed and frozen.
“We were thinking of the working mother trying to provide the most
nutritious meals to her family with limited time and skills,” says
Robert Murphy, chief operating officer of the Alexandria, Va.-based
company. “She’s juggling kids and a job, and she doesn’t want to go to
McDonald’s every night on the way home.”
Effectively appealing to women doesn’t have to mean developing new
products but doing a better job of selling seafood as inherently easy to
prepare, flavorful, healthful and nutritious, says chef and seafood
promotor Gary Puetz.
Seventy-seven percent of seafood in the United States is eaten away from
home, he adds, citing a grocers’ association survey. Women don’t cook
seafood at home because they’re afraid it will be an overcooked, stinky
meal that will make the kids turn up their noses.
“We need to tell ’em and show ’em,” says Puetz. As he sees it, and
Shanahan agrees, the secret to selling more fish to women — and to men,
for that matter — is simple: Just give them a little more information.
Bernie Monegain is a freelance writer and editor in Brunswick, Maine
|